Comme Des Fuckdown

A few friends IMed me and emailed me this morning saying they saw my photo of a friend on Gizmodo for the headline article, Bad Valentine: On Finding Awkward, Geek Love as well as on site banner.
The photo is licensed as Creative Commons Attribution / Noncommercial, both stipulations are disregarded as Gizmodo is a commercial site and I did not receive credit, nor was I asked permission for use of my picture. I’m used to seeing my photos used without permission or credit on style and fashion blogs run by individuals, but not by a media brand, one of the largest and most recognizable sites online.
Would this be acceptable from WIRED or the New York Times? I don’t really care on a personal level, it doesn’t bother me that they used my photo or that they didn’t give me credit, but I think the larger issues of journalistic accountability online and copyright adherence need to be addressed if digital content and traditional media are to be valued equally.

A few friends IMed me and emailed me this morning saying they saw my photo of a friend on Gizmodo for the headline article, Bad Valentine: On Finding Awkward, Geek Love as well as on site banner.

The photo is licensed as Creative Commons Attribution / Noncommercial, both stipulations are disregarded as Gizmodo is a commercial site and I did not receive credit, nor was I asked permission for use of my picture. I’m used to seeing my photos used without permission or credit on style and fashion blogs run by individuals, but not by a media brand, one of the largest and most recognizable sites online.

Would this be acceptable from WIRED or the New York Times? I don’t really care on a personal level, it doesn’t bother me that they used my photo or that they didn’t give me credit, but I think the larger issues of journalistic accountability online and copyright adherence need to be addressed if digital content and traditional media are to be valued equally.

26 notes

Loading...

previous post    /    next post →